Tag Archives: Discrimination

by | March 9, 2013 · 8:19 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Idaho Restaurant Chain Sued By Male Employee Who Claims “Only Women Allowed To Work As Bartenders”

“…lawsuit claims that service manager (stated) that the Louisville,Ky.-based chain’s regional director “only wanted girls working in the bar.” The complaint (states that restaurant) told women employees to wear tank EEOCtops and shorts to work and to “flirt with every guy that sits at the bar top…”

A former employee of the Texas Roadhouse restaurant in Ammon alleges only women can work as bartenders there, according to a complaint filed with the U.S. District Court of Idaho. Tim Fenton was employed at the restaurant as a trainer, bartender and server before his dismissal in October 2012.Fenton lost out on bartending assignments and Baird allegedly promoted a woman to tend bar that he had a crush on.

Baird also demoted Fenton from his position as a trainer allegedly in retaliation for his and his wife’s reports to Texas Roadhouse about the discrimination. Sam Angell, Fenton’s attorney, said his client made a formal complaint to the chain’s human resources department, but did not receive a report back regarding an investigation of the charges or its findings.

According to the Texas Roadhouse in Ammon, Baird is no longer employed at the restaurant. A representative for Texas Roadhouse corporate headquarters said he hadn’t seen the lawsuit so could not comment.

In order to pursue a job discrimination lawsuit in federal court, plaintiffs must first file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. According to Angell, the EEOC determined it would not be able to complete its investigation in the required 180 days so it issued a “Notice of Right to Sue.”

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Idaho Restaurant Chain Sued By Male Employee Who Claims “Only Women Allowed To Work As Bartenders”

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Insurance, Labor Issues, Management And Ownership, Training

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | February 6, 2013 · 8:11 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Louisiana Hotel Sued By Lobby Concierge For “Age Discrimination”

“…she was terminated in June 2012 from her position as a lobby concierge. At the time of her termination, she Hospitality Industry Lawsuitwas 53 years old…the plaintiff is asking for an award of damages for loss of pay, pain and suffering, mental anguish and distress, medical expenses, interest, and attorney’s fees…”

A former Ritz-Carlton concierge has filed an age discrimination lawsuit claiming she was terminated from her position due to her age and not because she left her shift two hours earlier than scheduled. Claudette Breve filed suit against The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co. on Jan. 11 in federal court in New Orleans.

Breve began working at the Marriott Hotel in New Orleans in February 1998 and transferred to the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in September  2000.

According to the court record, the defendant states it terminated Breve from her position because she violated hotel policies by leaving work early without the authorization of her supervisor. In response, Breve admits she left her shift early and states that she had arranged for another concierge to cover her shift. The other concierge failed to complete Breve’s shift and the replacement concierge arrived late for a shift. Breve and the person she arranged to complete her shift were fired over the incident, court documents state.

The defendant is accused violating the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

For more:  http://louisianarecord.com/news/248884-ritz-carlton-concierge-files-age-discrimination-lawsuit-after-termination

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Louisiana Hotel Sued By Lobby Concierge For “Age Discrimination”

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , ,

by | January 9, 2013 · 7:34 am

Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Maryland Restaurant Settles EEOC “Disability Discrimination And Retaliation Lawsuit” For $47,000; Deaf Prep Cook Was Harassed And Mocked

“…(the plaintiff) was harassed by a former management official because of his disability, through mockery (e.g. being called “vermin” instead of “Vernon”), and through threatening physical conduct…(his) prep cook EEOCduties were removed and that he was transferred to a dishwasher position because of his disability….In addition to the $47,814 in monetary relief to Davis, the two-year consent decree resolving the lawsuit enjoins McCormick and Schmick’s from violating the ADA, including with regard to harassment and retaliation…”

McCormick & Schmick’s Seafood Restaurant, Inc. will pay $47,814 and provide other relief to settle a disability discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

According to the EEOC’s suit, Vernon Davis, who has been deaf since childhood and uses American Sign Language and reads lips to communicate, satisfactorily performed his duties as a prep cook at the McCormick & Schmick’s National Harbor restaurant in Oxon Hill, Md. Prior to being hired by the defendant, Davis had obtained culinary training and had worked in several other restaurants.

After Davis and others complained about Davis being subjected to disability discrimination, the restaurant demoted him to a janitorial-type position and cut his hours because of his disability and in retaliation for the complaints, the EEOC charged. Four months later, McCormick and Schmick’s unlawfully fired Davis because of his disability and in retaliation for his complaints, the EEOC alleged in its lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Southern Division, Civil Action No. 8:11-cv-02695.

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Maryland Restaurant Settles EEOC “Disability Discrimination And Retaliation Lawsuit” For $47,000; Deaf Prep Cook Was Harassed And Mocked

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Training

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | October 11, 2012 · 6:11 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Nevada Hotel Settles Employment Discrimination Lawsuit With Justice Department For $49,000; Must Implement New Employment Eligibility Verification Policies

“Employers may not treat authorized workers differently during the employment eligibility verification and reverification process based on their citizenship status or national origin,” said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division.

Under the settlement agreement, Tuscany will pay $49,000 in civil penalties to the United States and full back pay to a victim.  In addition to corrective action already taken, Tuscany also agrees to implement new employment eligibility verification policies and procedures that treat all employees equally regardless of citizenship status, conduct training of its human resources staff on their responsibilities to avoid discrimination in the employment eligibility verification process, and be subject to reporting and monitoring requirements.

The Justice Department today reached an agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino LLC in Las Vegas resolving a lawsuit alleging that the company discriminated in the employment eligibility verification and re-verification process.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) requires employers to treat all authorized workers equally during the hiring, firing and employment eligibility verification process, regardless of their national origin or citizenship status.

The department’s case, filed on May 11, 2012, alleged that Tuscany treated non-citizens differently from U.S. citizens during the employment eligibility verification and reverification process.   The complaint alleged the casino required non-citizen employees to provide more or different documents or information than it required from citizen employees during the initial employment eligibility verification process.  According to the complaint, the company then used the documents or information it gathered to impose improper document requests on non-citizens during the reverification process as a condition of continued employment.
The complaint further alleged that the casino subjected non-citizen employees’ documents to a heightened review process by senior human resources representatives that was not applied to documents presented by U.S. citizens.

For more:  http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/drug-law/justice-department-settles-lawsuit-against-las-vegas-casino-unfair-documentary

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Nevada Hotel Settles Employment Discrimination Lawsuit With Justice Department For $49,000; Must Implement New Employment Eligibility Verification Policies

Filed under Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , ,

by | September 22, 2012 · 6:04 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Indiana Hotel Settles "Racial Discrimination Lawsuit" With EEOC For $355,000

The operators of an Indianapolis hotel have agreed to pay $355,000 to settle allegations they underpaid and fired African-American housekeepers because of their race…the settlement will be divided among 75 employees or job applicants.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced Friday that it had filed a consent degree in federal court with     Noble Management LLC and New Indianapolis Hotels LLC, which operate the Hampton Inn on Shadeland Avenue on Indianapolis’ north side.

The agency says the companies also retaliated against black employees who complained about racial bias. The EEOC also says the hotel regularly excluded African-American job applicants who were equally or better qualified than the Hispanic applicants it hired as housekeepers.

For more:  http://www.ibj.com/indy-hotel-to-pay–355-000-to-settle-race-lawsuit/PARAMS/article/36844

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Indiana Hotel Settles "Racial Discrimination Lawsuit" With EEOC For $355,000

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | September 18, 2012 · 6:12 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Pennsylvania Restaurant Franchise Settles "Class-Action Discrimination Lawsuit"; Employees Denied Promotion Can Get Compensation For "Lost Opportunities"

The lawsuit said that the company relegated black employees to  back-of-the-kitchen work and denied them promotional opportunities…Under the settlement, anyone who worked for Covelli’s Panera franchises from  Jan. 11, 2008, through Jan. 11, 2012, for more than one year, and applied for or  wanted a promotion, can get compensation for alleged lost opportunities…for  each hour worked after their first year, they can get 70 cents — roughly what  they would have gotten through a one-level promotion.

Around 200 to 300 current or former employees of Panera Bread franchisee  Covelli Enterprises stand to get payments under a class action lawsuit  settlement that won preliminary approval from a federal judge at a hearing  today.

Attorney Sam Cordes, who represents Mr. Vines and the class of employees,  told U.S. District Chief Judge Gary Lancaster that the settlement terms will  soon be published in newspapers in areas in which Covelli franchises  operate.

Judge Lancaster gave the settlement his initial nod, though he is expected to  hold a hearing to hear any objections from class members. Neither Mr. Cordes nor the attorney for Covelli would comment after the  hearing. Neither had an estimate of the costs to the firm.

In addition to the payments to black employees, Mr. Vines would get $10,000  and Mr. Cordes $66,000 under the settlement agreement.

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/region/panera-class-action-settlement-gets-preliminary-approval-653740/#ixzz26pWk7kLY

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Pennsylvania Restaurant Franchise Settles "Class-Action Discrimination Lawsuit"; Employees Denied Promotion Can Get Compensation For "Lost Opportunities"

Filed under Claims, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | August 17, 2012 · 6:48 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: California Hotel Owner Found Guilty Of Violating "Unruh Civil Rights Act" For Discrimination Against Religious Group; $1.2 Million Statutory Damages And $440,000 In Punitive Damages Awarded By Jury To Plaintiffs

“…The jury decided on Wednesday that the hotel and Adaya violated California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, which bars hotels and other business from discriminating on the basis of sex, race, color or religion…the hotel and owner were also ordered to pay approximately $440,000 in additional punitive damages to the plaintiffs…”

A Muslim hotel owner discriminated against a Jewish group during a Southern California poolside charity event by ordering removal of banners and ousting them from the pool and spa, a jury decided in awarding $1.2 million statutory damages. The suit was filed by Friends of the Israel Defense Forces, whose members had gathered two years ago at Santa Monica’s ocean-view Hotel Shangri-LA, which is owned by Tehmina Adaya. The owner is a Muslim of Pakistani descent.

The event was organized by Platinum Events, a marketing firm that had organized other gatherings at the Shangri-La after a $30-million renovation three years ago.

Workers and security guards at the Art Deco hotel were acting on Adaya’s orders when they told members of the group to get out of the pool and spa and remove banners and literature, according to trial testimony.

In her testimony, Adaya denied ordering a halt to the event for fear that her family would cut off her financing. Adaya inherited control of the hotel from her father, Ahmad Adaya, a real estate tycoon and philanthropist who died in 2006.

For more:  http://www.jewishjournal.com/thenon-prophet/item/additional_440000_in_punitive_damages_imposed_on_hotel_shangri-la_20120816/

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: California Hotel Owner Found Guilty Of Violating "Unruh Civil Rights Act" For Discrimination Against Religious Group; $1.2 Million Statutory Damages And $440,000 In Punitive Damages Awarded By Jury To Plaintiffs

Filed under Claims, Insurance, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | August 14, 2012 · 6:21 am

Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: California Hotel Sued By Former Hostess For "Harassment And Religious Discrimination"

“…Boudlal alleges in a lawsuit filed Monday, that her co-workers began taunting her, calling the Moroccan-born Muslim a “terrorist,” a “camel” and someone who learned how to make bombs at her mosque. She complained to her managers verbally and in writing, she said, with no results…”

Imane Boudlal is suing Walt Disney Corp. in federal court, saying that she was discriminated against and harassed for her religious beliefs. She also alleges that she unfairly lost her job in 2010 after refusing to remove her head scarf at work.

“It’s been hard,” Boudlal said in an interview. “I thought it was just a matter of complaining and a few days, and it wouldn’t affect my life, but it turns out … nothing has been done.”

The lawsuit charges that Boudlal, who is a naturalized U.S. citizen, decided to wear her hijab full time in 2010, about eight months after she began wearing it publicly. She contacted her supervisors at Disneyland to request an exemption to the company’s “look” policy — general appearance guidelines that, according to a Disney website, touch on items ranging from contact lens color and visible tattoos to personal hygiene.

For more:  http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-disney-muslim-lawsuit-20120814,0,2971071.story

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: California Hotel Sued By Former Hostess For "Harassment And Religious Discrimination"

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | July 23, 2012 · 6:08 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: California Hotel Sued For Discrimination Under "Unruh Civil Rights Act" For Prohibiting Charitable Event

Alleging that they were the victims of discrimination, Ryan, the grandson of Holocaust survivors, and 17 other individuals later filed suit against Adaya and the hotel under California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, which says no business establishment may discriminate on the basis of sex, race, color or religion. In addition to Adaya, the suit names Indus Investments Inc., the corporate owner and operator of the hotel.

Ari Ryan and other young leaders of the Friends of the Israel Defense Forces gathered on the afternoon of July 11, 2010, at the Hotel Shangri-La in Santa Monica for a charitable event. Soon after the party got underway around the hotel’s pool, apologetic hotel staff and security guards began telling group members to remove their literature and banners, to get out of the pool and hot tub, and to stop handing out T-shirts, according to Ryan and court documents.

The employees were acting on the orders of hotel owner Tehmina Adaya, according to the statements of witnesses and hotel employees in court documents. Adaya is a Muslim woman of Pakistani descent.

In court documents, Adaya said the July event had not been scheduled with the hotel and that the participants were trespassing on hotel property. Philip E. Black, an attorney for Adaya, declined to comment.

A jury trial is slated to begin Monday in Santa Monica Superior Court. The plaintiffs are seeking more than $1 million in damages.

According to the lawsuit, the charitable event was for the Legacy Program, a branch of the Friends of the Israel Defense Forces that raises funds to send children of fallen Israeli soldiers to summer camp. The party was planned by Platinum Events, a marketing firm that had organized other gatherings at the Shangri-La after the property underwent a $30-million renovation and reopened in mid-2009, the complaint said.

For more:  http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-shangri-la-lawsuit-20120723,0,868164.story

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: California Hotel Sued For Discrimination Under "Unruh Civil Rights Act" For Prohibiting Charitable Event

Filed under Guest Issues, Legislation, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | July 18, 2012 · 6:45 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Pennsylvania Casino Sued By Former Waitresses For Discrimination After Demotions For Becoming Pregnant; Violated "7% Body Weight Rule"

“…a rule remains that Parkettes and their male equivalents, Park Men, must not deviate more than 7 percent from their body weight when they were hired… these employees are considered entertainers because they participate in calendar and talent contests and make public appearances off-site. No other casino staffers are subject to the weight requirement…”

Two former cocktail waitresses have filed a federal lawsuit against Parx Casino, in Bensalem, Pa., claiming they were demoted when they became pregnant. Parx’s chief counsel said the casino’s policy has changed since the women filed complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 2009. The establishment now provides maternity versions of its skimpy uniforms to its cocktail waitresses, who are known as Parkettes.

Parkettes Alycia Campiglia, 27, and Christina Aicher, 31, who both became pregnant while working for the casino in 2008, claim that when they told managers they were pregnant, they were informed they could continue as Parkettes only until their costumes no longer fit, according to their lawsuit filed July 5.

Both women said they were offered transfers to the concession stand or players services, but they said they wouldn’t be able to earn tips. The EEOC determined in August 2009 that Parx had discriminated against pregnant cocktail servers.

“We changed the policy to say you can work (as a Parkette) if you’re pregnant,” said Thomas Bonner, Parx’s chief counsel and vice president. “We do have maternity costumes now.”

What hasn’t changed, though, is Parx’s strict weight limitations. Parkettes and Park Men are subject to periodic weigh-ins, and if they fail, they are subject to termination.

In 2006, cocktail waitresses at the Borgata Hotel Casino in Atlantic City filed a $70 million lawsuit against the casino for instituting a 7 percent weight-gain policy. The lawsuit was settled out of court in 2008 for terms that weren’t disclosed.

Last year, Resorts Casino in Atlantic City was hit with three lawsuits that are pending from veteran cocktail waitresses who claim that they were demoted or let go because they were too old or not sexy enough for the new flapper costumes.

For more:  http://www.thonline.com/news/national_world/article_e43a2ab7-1ca0-5a3d-8f10-7f9d0e2a561b.html

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Pennsylvania Casino Sued By Former Waitresses For Discrimination After Demotions For Becoming Pregnant; Violated "7% Body Weight Rule"

Filed under Claims, Insurance, Labor Issues, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , ,