Tag Archives: Sex Discrimination

by | August 15, 2013 · 5:53 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Pennsylvania Restaurant Sued By EEOC For “Gender Discrimination”; Female Workers Paid “Lower Hourly Wage”, “Fewer Regularly Scheduled Hours”

“…These women were subjected to a double whammy of discrimination,” said District Director Spencer H. Lewis, Jr., of the EEOC’s Philadelphia District Office. “They were paid a lower hourly wage and regularly scheduled for fewer work hours than their male counterparts. That’s why we EEOCredoubled our efforts to win justice for them…EEOC Regional Attorney Debra M. Lawrence added, “The EEOC is strongly committed to enforcing the equal pay laws and will take whatever action necessary to defend people’s rights in the workplace…”

Enforcement of equal pay laws and targeting compensation systems and practices that discriminate based on gender is of one of six national priorities identified by the EEOC’s Strategic Enforcement Plan.

Market Burgers, L.L.C., doing business as Checkers, a fast food restaurant chain, violated federal law by paying women less than men and scheduling them for fewer hours than their male counterparts because of gender, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit it announced today.

EEOC General Counsel David Lopez said, “This case demonstrates the significance of the agency’s strategic enforcement plan, reminding employers that the agency will exercise its authority to eliminate sex-based wage disparities in the workplace.”

According to the EEOC’s suit, LaToya Snyder began working as a cashier/sandwich maker at the company’s Checkers restaurant in West Philadelphia and was promoted to a shift manager position in 2010. The EEOC charges that Checkers routinely paid Snyder and other female shift managers lower wages than male shift managers even though they performed the same duties, including giving assignments and directions to other employees and scheduling and approving breaks. Checkers also paid female cashiers/sandwich makers less than their male counterparts even though they did substantially equal work, according to the lawsuit.

The EEOC further charges that Checkers suppressed the wages of Snyder and other female shift managers and cashiers/sandwich makers by scheduling them for 20 to 25 hours per week, even though they had requested full-time hours, while their male counterparts routinely were scheduled to work, on average, more than 30 hours per week. The general manager also required female employees to leave work early if the restaurant was not busy while male employees were permitted to work a full eight-hour shift.

For more:  http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/8-12-13.cfm

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Pennsylvania Restaurant Sued By EEOC For “Gender Discrimination”; Female Workers Paid “Lower Hourly Wage”, “Fewer Regularly Scheduled Hours”

Filed under Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | April 17, 2013 · 7:22 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Hotel And Restaurant Hiring Policies Must Be Neutral On Employee “Sex Stereoyping”; EEOC To Enforce “Broad Definition Of Sex Discrimination”

The EEOC Title VII effort to protect LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) workers relies on a broad definition of sex discrimination, treating harassment and discrimination claims under a “sex stereotyping” theory…The EEOC’s new emphasis on LGBT protections will shape its EEOCfuture en­­force­­ment and litigation against private employers, especially in states that don’t protect gender identity or sexual orientation. Expect the EEOC to educate the LGBT community about its recent rulings. Also expect more charges and more vigorous investigations…Make sure your policies are neutral with regard to sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and prohibit harassment based on sexual preference, gender stereotypes or intolerance.

Federal law doesn’t prohibit discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) workers. Instead, LGBT protections are a varied patchwork of judicial and agency interpretations and state and local laws that make discrimination actionable only under specific circumstances. LGBT workers continue to face employment discrimination with relatively few legal protections.

In response, the EEOC has begun an effort to protect LGBT workers’ rights by broadly interpreting Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC’s newly released Strategic Enforcement Plan for 2013-2016 lists “coverage of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals under Title VII” as one of its top six national en­­forcement priorities. Expect the EEOC to take significant enforcement actions soon and litigate issues more aggressively.

No national law explicitly bans workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Title VII’s language only protects individuals on the basis of “race, color, religion, sex, or natural origin.” LGBT advocates have tried to amend Title VII to add sexual orientation, expression and identity, but have consistently failed.

For more:  http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/35121/eeoc-steps-up-efforts-to-protect-against-lgbt-bias-harassment

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Hotel And Restaurant Hiring Policies Must Be Neutral On Employee “Sex Stereoyping”; EEOC To Enforce “Broad Definition Of Sex Discrimination”

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , , , , , ,

by | December 30, 2010 · 3:59 am

Hospitality Industry Employee Risks: Hotel Owners Should Maintain “Employment Practices Liability” Insurance Coverage For Wrongful Termination, Harassment And Discrimination Suits

EPL insurance policies protect businesses from the financial costs incurred from employment-related lawsuits filed for a range of reasons, from wrongful termination to harassment to discrimination and so on. More than half of claims are filed against small businesses…however, less than two percent of businesses with fewer than 50 employees purchase EPL insurance.

  • A recent Chubb survey found that 36 percent of private company executives understand the gravity of their exposure to EPL suits and 21 percent said they had an experience with an EPL suit in the last five years.
  • While every EPL policy is different, a company with $1 million in sales and 50 employees can likely get a policy for about $7,000 per year—$10,000 if they also take out coverage protecting directors and officers in the event of liability lawsuits against them personally.
  • The leading charge filed in discrimination cases is an allegation of racial discrimination, at 36 percent of cases, according to EEOC figures from 2009. Gender-based discrimination was alleged in 30 percent of cases.
  • Age-based claims made up 24 percent
  • Disabled claims tallied 23 percent.

In many cases, multiple allegations are made. One of the growing charges, according to the EEOC, is retaliation against employees for making discrimination claims, which can involve a job switch that the employee views as a demotion related to the initial claim.

“If you go to your supervisor and say you’ve been harassed by Joe, you can bring that claim to EEOC, but then if they decide to fire you or cut back your hours, that is the retaliation component,” says Tom Hams, Aon Risk Solutions’s EPL practice leader. “That retaliation component can survive much more than the allegation itself.” The employer may win on the allegation of whether or not you were discriminated against, but they may lose a case based on the retaliation claim for moving the complainant to a different job or office setting.

For more:  http://www.inc.com/guides/2010/12/how-to-reduce-employment-liability-claims_pagen_2.html#

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employee Risks: Hotel Owners Should Maintain “Employment Practices Liability” Insurance Coverage For Wrongful Termination, Harassment And Discrimination Suits

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | December 13, 2010 · 9:53 am

Hospitality Industry Employee Risks: Denver Hotel Forced To Pay $105,000 To Settle “Sex Discrimination” Suit Filed By “Equal Employment Opportunity Commission” (EEOC)

The suit alleged that the company denied an employee a promotion because of her gender, and “due to its discriminatory and stereotyped assumptions regarding [the worker’s] ability to do the job because of her status as a woman with young children.”

“Making assumptions about a woman’s ability to perform a job which are not grounded in fact, but instead on stereotyped assumptions about her inability to work long hours due to her child care responsibilities, is unlawful discrimination,” said EEOC Regional Attorney Mary Jo O’Neill.

The owner of Denver’s Brown Palace Hotel & Spa has agreed to pay $105,000 to settle a sex-discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the EEOC announced Wednesday.

The agency filed the suit on July 20 in U.S. District Court in Denver against Brown Palace owner Denver Hotel Management Co. Inc.

Discrimination based on a woman’s caregiver status is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC said.

At the time the suit was filed, Marcel Pitton, the hotel’s managing director, said the agency’s allegations were “unfounded,” and no admission of guilt was announced Wednesday.

“The Brown Palace Hotel is an equal opportunity employer and maintains a workplace free of unlawful discrimination. We are proud of our diverse workforce and the talent of our staff in delivering exceptional hospitality,” Pitton said in a July statement.

According to an EEOC statement, Denver Hotel Management has agreed “to revamp its discrimination policies and conduct training for all of its employees to explain how stereotypes concerning a person’s family responsibilities can constitute illegal sex discrimination.”

Read more: Brown Palace owner settles EEOC suit | Denver Business Journal

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employee Risks: Denver Hotel Forced To Pay $105,000 To Settle “Sex Discrimination” Suit Filed By “Equal Employment Opportunity Commission” (EEOC)

Filed under Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , ,